Skip to content

an initiative by Lucky Cockroach · luckycockroach.com

Coaching Report Card

Institute file

Vajiram & Ravi

Registered as
Vajiram and Ravi IAS Study Centre LLP
Headquarters
New Delhi
Exams
UPSC Civil Services

Penalised ₹7 lakh by CCPA in May 2026 for deliberate concealment of material information. Of 413 successful candidates the institute claimed for UPSC CSE 2023, the regulator found 258 had enrolled only in its free Interview Guidance Programme — offered after candidates clear Prelims and Mains on their own.

Section 01

The arithmetic

Every criterion starts at 100. Below is each point deducted, the published rule that triggered it, and the document it came from. Nothing here is a judgement call.

Regulatory Standing

65/100

Orders, penalties and findings recorded against the institute by a regulator.

Starting score100
Confirmed regulatory penalty order on record29 May 2026-35
Score65

Advertising Integrity

35/100

Whether a regulator has found the institute's advertising to be misleading.

Starting score100
Regulator found the advertisement misleading29 May 2026-40
Regulator found concealment of material information29 May 2026-25
Score35

Disclosure

40/100

Whether the institute discloses what its advertised successful candidates actually paid for.

Starting score100
Advertised success attributed to candidates who did not take the advertised paid course29 May 2026-40
That proportion exceeds half of the advertised candidates29 May 2026-20
Score40

Refund Policy

Not assessed

How the institute's own published refund policy compares to the national standard.

No public record on file touches this criterion, so we do not score it. This is deliberately not the same as a pass.

Service Delivery

Not assessed

Documented failures to deliver the teaching students actually paid for.

No public record on file touches this criterion, so we do not score it. This is deliberately not the same as a pass.

Grievance Redressal

Not assessed

Documented conduct when enrolled students raise complaints or ask for refunds.

No public record on file touches this criterion, so we do not score it. This is deliberately not the same as a pass.

Overall score is the mean of the 3 assessed criteria, rounded. Read the full methodology →

Section 02

The public record

Each document below is linked to its source. This is the entire evidentiary basis for the grade above — there is nothing else behind it.

  1. 01Regulatory order29 May 2026

    CCPA imposes ₹7 lakh penalty for misleading UPSC result claims

    The Central Consumer Protection Authority passed a final order against Vajiram and Ravi IAS Study Centre LLP, imposing a penalty of ₹7,00,000 for indulging in misleading advertisement through deliberate concealment of material information, in violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The Authority — headed by Chief Commissioner Nidhi Khare with Commissioner Anupam Mishra — found the institute had made tall claims and prominently used the names, photographs and achievements of successful UPSC CSE 2023 candidates while concealing which specific courses those candidates had actually taken. The advertisements on its own website claimed "8 Rank Holders in the Top 10 are from Vajiram & Ravi", "37 Rank Holders in the Top 50 are from Vajiram & Ravi", and that more than 30% of officers selected through the examination every year were its students. Of 413 successful candidates the institute claimed for CSE 2023, CCPA found 258 had enrolled only in its free Interview Guidance Programme — a programme offered after a candidate has already cleared Prelims and Mains without the institute's paid help. The penalty was to be deposited within 15 days. CCPA stated that non-disclosure of course details deprives consumers of the ability to make an informed choice.

    Points this document deducted (5)
    • standingConfirmed regulatory penalty order on record-35
    • adsRegulator found the advertisement misleading-40
    • adsRegulator found concealment of material information-25
    • disclosureAdvertised success attributed to candidates who did not take the advertised paid course-40
    • disclosureThat proportion exceeds half of the advertised candidates-20

Section 04

What students say

Separate from the evidence above, and separate from the grade. This is where students who actually studied at Vajiram & Ravi describe what they got for their money.

Reviews are the opinions of individual students, published after a moderator checks them. They are not findings of this site or of any regulator, and they have no effect whatsoever on Vajiram & Ravi's grade — that comes only from the documents above.

Reviews are unavailable right now. The grade above is unaffected.

Student reports

Report count unavailable

We could not read the report count just now, so we are not showing a number rather than showing one we have not verified. The grade above is unaffected — it comes entirely from the documents on this page.

File your report

Right of reply

This space is reserved for Vajiram & Ravi

Nothing has been published here yet, and no inference should be drawn from that — this file is built from public documents and we have not asked the institute for comment. If you represent this institute and believe anything above is inaccurate, write to corrections@coachingreportcard.com. We correct errors promptly and publish any reply in full, unedited, in this space.